One of the features of
every World Cup is the vast lengths players will go to convince a referee
they’re hurt or almost mortally wounded in a challenge. This is done simply to gain an advantage over
the other side. In a competition where
you may only play five or six times, if that advantage means you win a match
then it has huge implications for your team.
Two of the most infamous
instances of conning a referee into believing they were injured occurred in
1998 and 2002.
In 2002 in South Korea,
Brazil were up against Turkey in the opening game of Group C. Brazil were 2-1 up, having been a goal down
with Rivaldo’s penalty three minutes before the end looking to have settled the
match. Deep into injury time the
Brazilians were ‘trying to run the clock down’ by wasting as much time as
possible. They had a corner on the right
and Rivaldo was going to take it. He
stood next to the corner flag, with the ball just lying on the pitch a few
yards from him. Looking for all the
world as if he was waiting for a little porter to come on and bring it to
him. Turkish midfielder, Hakan Ursan,
was clearly frustrated with this blatant abuse of time, so he walked over and
kicked the ball at the lauded Brazilian.
The ball hit Rivaldo on his legs and he was immediately castled, rolling
around on the ground as if he’d been shot.
But the icing on the cake was the fact he was holding his face and for a
brief moment it appeared Ursan had kicked the ball into Rivaldo’s face. Our opinions were soon altered when the
replay clearly showed Rivaldo being hit on his legs yet he was holding his
face.
The referee, who only got
one look at the incident, believed Rivaldo’s version and awarded a yellow card
to the Turk, who’d been booked earlier in the game, and as a result meant he
was sent-off and banned for two matches.
Rivaldo, one of the most revered player of his generation, had conned
the referee and thought he’d conned the watching world. FIFA eventually caught with the coverage and
fined him £4,500. They didn’t recind poor Ursan’s red card, though.
Rewind four years to
France ’98 and the Semi-Final stage at Stade de France. France are up against Croatia and after
conceding first they are 2-1 up, with about 15 minutes to go. The French have a free-kick on the left level
with the edge of the penalty area. Both
teams have about five players each in the box and as the kick comes over,
Croatian defender goes down holding his face.
The ball is hit too long and goes out for a goal-kick, but the referee
has blown for an infringement. He walks
up to Laurent Blanc, the ever reliable French central defender, and shows him
the red card. Evidently, Blanc had
struck Bilic as they jostled for space in the area just before the ball was
delivered. Again the watching world
thought this was a stupid attack from the Frenchman when a World Cup Final
appearance beckoned. But, as with the
Rivaldo incident, replays soon gave us the real truth.
As Bilic grabbed hold of
Blanc’s shirt the Frenchman turned away from the ball and in an attempt to free
himself from the Croatian’s clutches, slapped Bilic in the throat with the palm
of his hand. Bilic, sensing an
opportunity, went down holding his head as if Blanc had punched him. Blanc had receive straight red card yet
immediately received sympathy from the viewing public. He’d been cheated out of an appearance in the
Final, the pinnacle of any footballer’s career.
At 32 it was clearly going to be his only chance of a World Cup Final
and in one act of skulduggery it had been taken from him. Bilic, who was playing his football at
Everton at the time, has struggled to shake off the ignominy of the incident
especially when compared to his ‘nice guy’ image. What was worse for Blanc was that his replacement
was Chelsea’s Frank Leboeuf, who seemed hardly fit to lace Blanc’s boots but
actually gave a good account of himself in the Final.
Again, FIFA may well have
subsequently agreed a red card wasn’t deserved, they didn’t recind it, Blanc
sat out the Final, Lebouef got a winner’s medal but the only saving grace is
the invention of youtube has meant few will ever forget the antics of Rivaldo
and Bilic.
These two incidents are convincing arguments why at World Cup finals tournaments there should be a video review panel who can rescind cards given to players who were conned by "divers", as well as handing out immediate match suspensions for "divers". It would only take a couple of players to miss crucial matches for "diving" to get most players to avoid "diving".
ReplyDeleteYeah I've heard that view from a few ex-players and I suppose if you know the authorities are watching and can punish retrospectively, then maybe players will think differently. One argument against that is what happens if the player who has gets banned is the one who scored the only goal of the game to put a side out? Does that not put even more pressure on referees & FIFA don't seem keen to reduce their authority.
ReplyDeleteOne thing I think has crept in recently is players 'anticipating' a challenge by going over to avoid contact. When you slow it down it looks like a dive, but in real time you can see why players might do it.
Interesting debate, though