Thursday, 24 December 2015

Taking it on the Chin





If you want to know the effect Jimmy Hill had on English football, try writing its history over the past fifty years and leave him out.

Much of what we now call ‘the product’ of football can be traced back to him.  You could argue he has had more of an effect, made more changes and enhancements than any other individual in world football.

With football being awash with money these days I am often critical of players who move straight into the media after they finish playing rather than putting something back into the game by moving into coaching or management.  Well Jimmy did both.  In every sense of the word he was a pioneer.

Here’s just a list of some of his achievements


  • ·         Negotiated abolition of the maximum wage, leading to footballers being paid what   they’re worth.
  • ·         Changed Coventry City’s colours to create the brand, Sky Blues.
  • ·         Introduced first all-seater stadium at Coventry’s Highfield Road.
  • ·         Pressed The FA to increase the prize for a win from two points to three.  An initiative then adopted throughout the world.
  • ·         Campaigned for the abolition of the back pass.
  • ·         Introduced the concept of a panel of pundits for TV World Cup coverage.
  • ·         Was driving force behind Match of the Day, turning it into an institution.

Born in Balham, South London on 22nd July 1928, his football career began at Brentford where he played under future England manager, Ron Greenwood, before moving to Fulham in 1952.  He played an influential part in the club’s journey to the FA Cup Semi-Final in 1958 when he scored in every round.  He once scored five goals in a game at Doncaster, in 1958. 

In 1957 he became chairman of the PFA and led a campaign to force clubs to abolish the maximum weekly wage

Maximum Wage

Ever since the turn of the twentieth century the Football League set a maximum amount by which players could be paid.  This contributed in clubs being able to treat players exactly as they wanted.  They could determine exactly how much they wanted to pay them and were also in complete control over whether the player stayed at the club or not.  In short, players were treated in a way synonymous with slavery.  Jimmy Hill believed this was wrong, but the clubs were so powerful they didn’t take him seriously to begin with.  Not until he threatened a strike.  This was unheard of in football.

There were those who believed it would be the end of footballers in touch with the public.  It divided the nation.  But Jimmy was adamant players deserved to be paid their worth and some players were making the clubs a lot of money and should be appropriately rewarded.  He also believed they should be free to negotiate their own contracts, much like other professions.

The clubs, and some of the managers, were against the idea but gradually the players voted for industrial action and eventually they got their way.  Many pointed to Jimmy’s influence and determination in being a key factor.  The much predicted wage spiral didn’t happen immediately, although Fulham’s Chairman, Tommy Trinder, hit upon the publicity value in handing his star player, Johnny Haynes a £100-per-week contract.  But it wasn’t until players such as Jimmy Greaves and Dennis Law moved abroad that clubs realised they’d have to concede to pressure and increase the amount they were paying players.

By the end of the 1960’s George Best was earning £1,000-per-week at Manchester United.  When the Premier League was launched the highest paid player was John Barnes who was paid £100,000-per-week, but since then wages have exploded beyond all proportion.

In the week Jimmy died there is something remarkably ironic in players of a club seeming to refuse to play for a manager so the club has little choice to sack him and find a replacement.

In later years Jimmy felt the growth in players’ wages had gone too far.  But then that’s a matter for clubs today rather than something he needed to worry about at the time.  What is plainly obvious is clubs were pocketing all the gate receipts for themselves without rewarding the players for attracting huge crowds.  The players were paid £20-per-week when the average wage in the country was £18-per-week.  You can hardly blame the players for believing the clubs considered them nothing more than bit parts in the performance in the same way they did the audience.  The fans weren’t flocking to football grounds for the buildings themselves, they were there to witness the performance of the players and the clubs needed to understand that.

Back on the pitch he became an instrumental part of the Fulham side which won promotion back to the First Division in 1959 after an absence of seven years.  Unfortunately, he was only able to enjoy another couple of seasons as a player and at the age of 32 he had to retire due to a long-term knee injury.  He’d played 276 games in nine seasons at Craven Cottage.

He published his first book called “Striking for Soccer” and in it he revealed many suggestions he had for revolutionising the game, which today have become and part and part of football, but back then were seen as something from another planet.

He advocated the introduction of a super league, a winter break and regular midweek evening games played under floodlights.  He also saw television playing more of a role in broadening the popularity of the game.  He argued one game each weekend should be played live in front of cameras, perhaps on a Friday night.

Coventry City

In 1961 he took up the manager’s job at Coventry City, who were languishing in Division Three (League One, today).  They had spent time in Division Two either side of the war but then they fell back and even spent a season in Division Four in 1958.

Backed by his chairman, Derrick Robbins, he set about implementing many of his other ideas such as providing better facilities and more entertainment for supporters.  He was the first man in football to really consider the spectators as customers of the club and therefore he set about improving the match day experience, something every club does these days.  He introduced the first electronic scoreboard, launched the first glossy match magazine, brought in the first pre-match entertainment any ground had seen in England, and provided free soft drinks and snacks for children.  He continued the change of image for the club by launching what was known as, the “Sky Blue Revolution”.  He changed their home kit from navy and white back to colours they used to use fifty or so years before, sky blue.  He gave them their nickname and a club song, as well as organising the club’s own rail service for fans to get to away games.

For the players he lifted a ten year club ban on them talking to the press and demanded they call him “JH” rather than sir, boss or gaffer.  He did not sign anybody above the age of 25 and brought in a more analytical approach to training.

In 1965 he set up the first ‘beam-back’ broadcast when City’s midweek game at Cardiff City was watched by over 10,000 supporters back at Highfield Road.

It wasn’t long before improvements were seen on the pitch too, and in 1964 they won the Division Three title and then three years later, won Division Two to move into English football’s top division for the first time in their history.  Their first two seasons were tough as they narrowly avoided relegation by a point each time but in 1970 they finished sixth, their best ever top flight finish.  But by this time Jimmy had stepped down as manager to take up a role at London Weekend Television as head of sport.

Television

He didn’t wait long before making changes there too.  These were pioneering days for football on television and the 1970 World Cup in Mexico was going to be the first one where football showed a whole host of live games.  In preparation, Jimmy hit upon the idea of a panel of pundits to debate what they were about to watch and then chew the fat over what they had just seen.  Ever the visionary, Jimmy soon understood the effect having some big personalities and egos in the studio together, would have on the viewing experience for those at home.  The arguments between Derek Dougan, Malcolm Allison, Paddy Crerand and Bob McNab became compulsory viewing and the format has been retained ever since.

Jimmy was one of those visionaries who could see the impact television was likely to have on the game and this was where he concentrated his energy.  In 1972 he moved back to the BBC to present Match of the Day.  The programme had begun in 1964 but spent much of the sixties convincing the clubs it was not going to steal their audience.  Jimmy again brought his creative juices to the concept and encouraged slow-motion replays, using them as a way of showing goals as well as illustrating certain key moments in a game which may garner discussion for the watching public.  Jimmy would often criticise refereeing decisions and was able to use television to prove his theories.

In a time when live broadcasts of matches were still confined to the FA Cup Final, England v Scotland and the odd international match, Jimmy was one of the first to be used as a summariser during a match.  But not in a way where people today talk almost as much as the commentator, but during the cup final he would be asked his views on how the game was going about every fifteen minutes.

The 1983-84 season saw the advent of another of Jimmy’s ideas when Match of the Day showed a live league match on the BBC for the first time.  It was two months after ITV had shown theirs but still Manchester United v Tottenham on 16th December 1983 was historic at any rate.

During his broadcasting career, Jimmy returned to Coventry as managing director and eventually becoming chairman.   In 1981 Jimmy’s proposal to convert Highfield Road to an all-seater stadium was realised.  It was the first ground in England to move to all-seater and given what was suggested by the Taylor report in 1989, it was another example of Jimmy being ahead of his time.

Unfortunately, the all-seater project was abandoned two years later when standing room was re-instated.  What hadn’t helped the plan was Leeds fans ripping out several hundred seats just months after they’d been put in.

When Highfield Road closed its doors for the last time in 2005, Jimmy received a hero’s welcome from the crowd and fans voted for a bar at the new ground, Ricoh Arena, to be named “Jimmy’s” in his honour.

Other Notable Achievements

Unlike today where Match of the Day pundits watch all live matches at the same time from a control room at the studios, when Jimmy was preparing for the programme he had to be at a ground to be able to summarise it that evening.  Often he would get a private plane to fly him back to the studio.  During one match at Highbury in September 1972, the linesman pulled a muscle and couldn’t continue.  As the match couldn’t be continued without a qualified official there was an appeal over the tannoy to see if anyone in the crowd could help.  Step forward Mr Hill, who confirmed himself to be a qualified referee and so he donned a sky blue tracksuit and ran the line.

At the beginning of the 1980’s there were discussions around how to improve football and raise the attendances at league grounds.  One of Jimmy’s ideas was the change the points awarded for a win from two to three.  He argued many matches can end up turgid, dour affairs with neither side wanting to make a mistake and risk losing the point they were on course for.  Jimmy’s suggestion promised to offer a greater prize for the side willing to give it everything right up to the final whistle, turning one point into three.  In 1981 the FA formerly adopted the new system for league matches.  Few major nations followed, until Italy brought it in, in 1993 and then UEFA used it for the Euro ’96 qualifying campaign.  Nowadays it is used globally around all leagues.

 When Coventry City won the FA Cup, their only major honour ever, joint managers George Curtis and John Still were keen to point out the excellent ground work Jimmy put in which they believed had gone a long way to contributing to the club’s success.  Having never ever been in Division One until promotion in 1967 under Jimmy’s management, Coventry then spent thirty-four seasons in England’s top division.  By the time they eventually succumbed to relegation, in 2001, only Arsenal, Everton and Liverpool had spent a longer unbroken spell there.

He returned to Fulham as chairman in 1987 where he staved off the threat of bankruptcy and a merger with Queen’s Park Rangers before setting the club up for a more successful period under new owner, Mohamed Al Fayed.

He was awarded the OBE for services to football in 1994.  In 1999 Jimmy moved from the BBC to Sky Sports and fronted a new programme, Jimmy Hill’s Sunday Supplement, a weekly discussion between Jimmy and three football journalists conducted over breakfast.  He chaired the programme for six seasons before his co-presenter, Brian Woolnough took over and Jimmy was no longer a regular on our screens.

Some may have viewed Jimmy by then as a man of the past, a dinosaur, stuck in the past.  In fact, during his broadcasting career he was continually criticised for his outspoken views.  Yet this is what attracted the viewers and after all what is the point of a television programme if you cannot get anyone to watch it?

Above all, Jimmy was ridiculed for his chin which protruded somewhat.  In fact when I was at school there was a fashion to rub your chin when you were being told something you didn’t quite believe, saying ‘Jimmy’ in a rather sarcastic voice just to confirm the disbelief.

Des Lynam recalled, “we were at a ground and all 30,000 people started chanting at him, but not quite in his favour.  I asked him how he put up with it and he simply said ‘that’s fame for you’.  He was not going to be beaten by a chanting crowd”.

For a man who achieved so much in football it must have appeared odd why he would be subject to such ridicule but Jimmy clearly loved the game and seem to revel in any debate about it.

Shortly after his final appearance for Sky Sports he was diagnosed with the early stages of Alzheimer’s.  This seems a particularly cruel disease for a man with so much to be proud to remember.  His last public appearance came in 2011 when he unveiled a statue of himself at the Ricoh Arena.  In 2012 he was moved to a nursing home where he spent his last three years.

Jimmy Hill died on 19th December 2015 aged 87.  He can honestly be considered to have lived a full life and much of it in the service of others.  His love of football was obvious and whether you agreed with him or not, you cannot deny he had the game’s best interests at heart.

All footballers these days owe a debt of gratitude to Jimmy every time they negotiate a new contract and look at their bank balance.  Every supporter who enjoys the comfort of a matchday experience can largely tip their hat to Jimmy for having the foresight to consider them when other clubs were just content to pack as many people in for the match itself.  When you watch coverage of football from the comfort of your home, you can thank Jimmy for pioneering many ideas to improve the viewing experience.  There are many other things for football to be thankful to Jimmy for and we will never know what might have been had he not been around.  Given the events at FIFA recently, one feels certain the organisation would not have got into such a mess had he been involved.  His sense of fair play and concern for the paying spectator would have given the international game a completely different look.

As it is we can be thankful for being around when Jimmy was and thankful there are people who can relay his story.  In a time when football and footballers have never been richer, football is a poorer for his loss.

Monday, 21 December 2015

No Mour I Love Yous




Another season and another Chelsea manager gets the chop.  Another Chelsea manager gets the sack after the players refuse to play for him.

Just seems like those two statements could be from any of the past ten years in English football but there are some surprising factors to the story this week.  Not least that the once untouchable, almost demi-Godlike Jose Mourinho would go the same way of Carlo Ancelotti and Phil Scolari as stories of the players not playing for the manager anymore, began to do the rounds.

This was Mourinho’s second spell as manager at Stamford Bridge with his first one bringing six trophies in three seasons, the second one had not been as prolific yet still he delivered the Premier League title for the third time. 

Back in May Chelsea were crowned Premier League Champions for the fourth time in their history and the fifth time they have been Champions of England.  They won the league by eight points and looked odds-on to retain it again this season, albeit fending off a sterner challenge from Manchester City.  Yet here we are barely five months of football later and the Champions have jettisoned their most successful manager.  So what has gone wrong?

There doesn’t seem to be any one factor which has contributed to this, but what certainly can’t be denied is Chelsea have not been unlucky.

When comparing with other big clubs who have sacked managers in the last couple of seasons, Brendan Rodgers and David Moyes for example, you can point to them having suffered some bad luck.  Of course you can also point to many of their problems being self-inflicted.  But Chelsea haven’t really had many injuries in the past five months, they haven’t been victim to many poor refereeing decisions.  They haven’t had some of their best players just decide to leave or retire.  What they do seem to have is a vast number of players either alarmingly losing form or just finding it impossible to get themselves going this season, or they just decided they didn’t want Jose in charge anymore.

People have pointed to things going wrong right from pre-season.  It was suggested the players didn’t have a proper build-up to the season with the club preferring to fly them all over the world to add more shirt sales than preparing the players to be the first club to retain the title for seven years.  They were also called back to pre-season training a little later than usual owing to many of them needing a longer rest.

Then on the opening day of the season Mourinho had a spat with club doctor, Eva Caneiro when the Portuguese objected to her going onto the pitch to administer treatment to Eden Hazard.  This always seemed a strange episode and looking back perhaps started the downhill slide which eventually lead to his demise.

Chelsea were struggling to see off a Swansea team at home and things were compounded by the sending off of their keeper, Thibaut Courtois.  Hazard went down under a challenge and immediately Caneiro and physio, Jon Fearn, went to assist.  As Hazard was treated on the pitch he was then obliged to walk to the touchline and wait for the referee to allow him back on.  This meant Chelsea were down to nine men and this seems to be what incensed Mourinho.  The club backed their manager, Caneiro was demoted and made her way to her lawyers, and the spectre of Hazard being injured was to re-emerge this week to haunt Mourinho.

After dropping points at home to Swansea, they were then well beaten at Manchester City and their first win of the season (at West Brom) was soon expunged by defeats at home to Palace and away to Everton.  By the time Southampton came to Stamford Bridge and came away with all three points, the Champions had lost four of their opening eight fixtures.  Within this sequence was an impressive win over Arsenal where they finally showed the form of last season.

But consecutive defeats to West Ham, Liverpool and Stoke City just compounded the misery.  At home to Liverpool they took an early lead but were ultimately swept aside showing defensive frailties unheard of from a Mourinho side.  What did for Jose in the end were back-to-back league defeats to Bournemouth and Leicester City.

Mourinho’s record at Stamford Bridge this season has taken a real pounding.  He went seventy-seven games without losing at home as Chelsea manager before Sunderland prevailed in April 2014.  But thirteen points from a possible twenty-seven at home just hasn’t been good enough for the owner, and with just one win away from home this is what sat them just above the relegation zone.

We may never know why many players, who were excellent last season, have suffered such a slump in form but the likes of Azpilacueta, one of the best defenders in the league, Hazard, footballer of the year last season, Ivanovic, Costa, Fabregas and Oscar have just been woeful.  On Monday night at Leicester, Hazard went down under a challenge from Jamie Vardy and received treatment.  Mourinho tried to get him back on the pitch but the player took one step and then shrugged his shoulders and flounced off.  Mourinho’s comments at the end of the game suggested he was not best pleased with this behaviour.

That post-match interview ultimately put the nails in the coffin as Mourinho chose to criticise his players rather than desperately try and defend them.  He had tried to criticise them earlier in the season, even dropping Matic, Terry and one or two others, but had recently sought to build them up.  He appeared to lose patience as he accused them of ignoring his pre-match tactics.

I think there’s far too much fuss made of whether a manager should criticise his players or not.  For a player who seeks to share no responsibility in a defeat, he may clearly object to any negativity towards him.  But a player has to be able to take criticism of his performance, however it is offered.  There are plenty of opportunities for a manager to back his players, but if he cannot ever make his disappointment known then he is making a rod for his own back where some players believe they are above criticism, and therefore do not have to play to their best in every match.  Players need to be treated differently by managers and who are we to suggest that the manager does not understand how his players’ minds work?

But if a player is to take his manager’s criticism and decide not to bother playing for him, then his sulking is letting down himself, his teammates, the club and their supporters just because he wants to spite the manager.  It’s a measure of the power players have these days they can afford to risk the fortunes of their club in order to force the owners into making a managerial change, knowing their future at that same club may pass unaffected.

But have the Chelsea players underestimated their position with the fans?  From the reaction at the first game of post-Mourinho Chelsea mark two, it would appear they have.  The supporters seem pretty clear in who is to blame, singling out Ivanovic, Costa and Hazard.  Diego Costa was booed off when substituted and no doubt some of the cheers for Ivanovic scoring the first goal were ironic.

As I mentioned at the start of this piece, Chelsea players have form where this is concerned and previously the fans have always backed them.  But it appears they have over-egged their popularity one time too many.

The club have moved quickly to appoint a stop-gap with Guus Hiddink returning to Stamford Bridge for his second spell after he held that position in 2009 after the players decided they’d had enough of Scolari.  He lost just one match during his four month spell and oversaw an FA Cup victory.  Ultimately, Chelsea will need to find a permanent replacement with Pep Guardiola and Diego Simeone being mentioned.  Much may depend on the freedom a new man is given, but he would be taking over a squad much unchanged from that which lifted the Premier League title in May.

It could be an interesting end to the season if Chelsea find themselves still embroiled in a relegation battle.  Clubs who have come through the battle successfully often point to team spirit being an important factor.  But if some players still hold resentment in Mourinho being ousted by other players then when the pressure reaches boiling point it will be interesting to see whether they stick together or start ripping each other apart.

I expect Chelsea to get themselves out of the mess they’re in and where I said you couldn’t point to them being unlucky, this would now be to their advantage.  It may sound simple but all they need to do is play as they can and they should gain enough points to fight off any threat of relegation, but European qualification for next season looks impossible, unless they can win the Champions League.


Saturday, 12 December 2015

Euro 2016 Draw





England and Wales were drawn in the same group for the European Championships in France next summer.

The draw, this evening in Paris, saw two of the home nations pitted together with Slovakia and Russia in Group B.  England will take on Wales in Lens on June 16 in what will be their second match of the tournament.

England’s opening game is in Marseille against Russia on June 11.  Marseille was the venue for England’s 2-0 win over Colombia in France ’98 when David Beckham scored a great free-kick.  England’s last group match will be against Slovakia in St. Etienne on June 20.  St. Etienne was another of England’s venues in ’98, where they lost on penalties to Argentina and Michael Owen scored ‘that goal’.

This tournament has been expanded to 24 teams and this has thrown up the romantic occurrence of several first-timers to Europe’s top party.  Wales and Northern Ireland will make their bow in June, as will Albania, Slovakia and Iceland.

England were one of the top seeds in the draw, along with France, Spain, Germany, Portugal and Belgium.  France were automatically drawn into Group A, although UEFA couldn’t avoid the futility of having to draw their name out anyway, presumably to make sure we hadn’t forgotten them.

They were drawn in with Romania, Albania and Switzerland.  France v Romania will be the opening match Euro 2016 at Stade de France on June 10.

England were drawn out next to go into Group B, along with Wales who meet Slovakia first up on day two of the tournament in Bordeaux.

Northern Ireland were drawn into Group C, which was headed up by World Champions, Germany.  Ukraine and Poland make up the group.  Northern Ireland’s first opponents will be Poland in Nice on June 12.  They take on Germany in Paris on June 21, after meeting Ukraine in Lyon on June 16.

Defending champions, Spain, were drawn into Group D and will meet Czech Republic in their opening game.  Turkey and Croatia were also drawn into this group.

Group E appears to be the toughest of them all and poor old Republic of Ireland were given the honour of trying to find their way out of this one.  Belgium, who top FIFA rankings, Italy and Sweden are to be their opponents.  June 13 sees both opening games in this group with the Republic coming up against Sweden in Stade de France.  They then take on Belgium in Bordeaux on June 18 finishing with Italy in Lille on June 22.

Group F, in contrast, appears the easiest of groups and Portugal can consider themselves very lucky to be drawn top seed in this one.  They’re up against Iceland, Hungary and Austria.

The top two in each group progress to the knock-out stage along with four of the best third-placed teams.  These will be determined by points first, goal difference next and then goals scored.  The knockout phase takes on a similar format as World Cups do, with a Second Round, consisting of sixteen teams leading to a Quarter-Finals, Semi-Finals before the Final at Stade de France on July 10.

There are many matches to look forward to and I’ll be posting some previews in anticipation of an exciting tournament.

In addition, I will be posting pieces on each of the previous tournaments.

If you want to follow the tournament using an online wallchart then look no further than this website.  This guy puts together some wonderful spreadsheets which means all you have to do is enter each result and the document automatically updates.  You can try and predict the scores too and see who might meet who in the knock-out rounds.